Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Asian Spine Journal ; : 464-471, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-889561

ABSTRACT

Methods@#Patients admitted for surgical treatment of CDD were recruited. The following patient-reported outcome measures were recorded on the day before the surgery: the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for neck pain intensity, Neck Disability Index (NDI), EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) survey, Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were used. We performed three multiple regression analyses to investigate the effects of CSS and psychological factors on the clinical features. @*Results@#Multiple regression analysis revealed that CSI had a significant effect on NRS (β, 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.71), NDI (β, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.82), and EQ-5D (β, −0.55; 95% CI, −0.75 to −0.35). Multiple regression analysis revealed that psychological factors did not exert a significant effect on the clinical features. @*Conclusions@#Our results demonstrated that CSI was able to identify the clinical features in CDD patients, suggesting that CSS does affect the clinical features of such patients.

2.
Asian Spine Journal ; : 464-471, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-897265

ABSTRACT

Methods@#Patients admitted for surgical treatment of CDD were recruited. The following patient-reported outcome measures were recorded on the day before the surgery: the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for neck pain intensity, Neck Disability Index (NDI), EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) survey, Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were used. We performed three multiple regression analyses to investigate the effects of CSS and psychological factors on the clinical features. @*Results@#Multiple regression analysis revealed that CSI had a significant effect on NRS (β, 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.71), NDI (β, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.82), and EQ-5D (β, −0.55; 95% CI, −0.75 to −0.35). Multiple regression analysis revealed that psychological factors did not exert a significant effect on the clinical features. @*Conclusions@#Our results demonstrated that CSI was able to identify the clinical features in CDD patients, suggesting that CSS does affect the clinical features of such patients.

3.
Palliative Care Research ; : 538-542, 2016.
Article in Japanese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-378470

ABSTRACT

<p>Objective: We describe a case of lung cancer complicated with esophageal achalasia (EA), which was successfully treated with endoscopic pneumatic dilation (EPD). Case: A 66-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because of frequent episodes of emesis and dysphagia after receiving an escalating dose of sustained release oxycodone (SRO) for cancer-related multifactorial back pain. She had been diagnosed with EA and treated with EPD at the age of 50. Her symptoms were refractory to the conventional anti-emetic agents such as prochlorperazine and metoclopramide. Computed tomography imaging showed marked dilatation of the esophagus with food residue. We diagnosed EA based on the presence of rosette-like esophageal folds on endoscopy and narrowing of the esophagogastric junction on esophagography, and subsequently performed EPD, which alleviated the symptoms. Discussion: The effects of opioids on esophageal motility have not been elucidated thus far. Recent studies using high-resolution manometry reported that long-term use of opioids was associated with esophageal dysmotility similar to that observed in EA. Although we have no evidence to directly demonstrate the causal relationship between the use of SRO and anti-emetic agents and EA, we speculate that our patient’s symptoms might be associated not only with SRO-related emesis during the gradual worsening of EA, but also partly with the SRO-induced esophageal dysmotility and the constrictive effect of dopamine D<sub>2</sub> receptor antagonists on the lower esophageal sphincter. Care must be taken to avoid drug-induced esophageal motor dysfunction, which might lead to deteriorate EA. </p>

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL